The interview that showed Meghan Markle was going to break ALL the royal rules – and it was only a sign of things to come

She said the agency should have had her comments about her relationship with Harry removed, raising fears she would fire them over the cover, and questions were asked about why there was not more about her philanthropy and activism in the piece.
Mr Bower reported that the piece omitted comments on this because Vanity Fair researchers were unable to prove her claims were accurate.

Specifically, the magazine couldn’t establish for sure that she had played a role in persuading Procter and Gamble to change their slogan, nor could they independently prove she received a reply after writing to then-first lady Hillary Clinton.
According to Mr Bower, Mr Kashner later recalled: ‘She complained because she wasn’t presented in the way she wanted. She demanded the media do what she expected. I felt manipulated.’
Mr Sunshine reportedly told Vanity Fair’s editor that he would have to ‘deal with the Queen on this’.
He was told that Meghan only got the cover ‘because of who she was likely to marry,’ Bower wrote, and not on her own merit.
Meghan was also enraged because she believed the headline to be racist, according to royal author Valentine Low.
In his book Courtiers: The Hidden Power Behind The Crown, he wrote: ‘Meghan hated it. And she was furious with Keleigh Thomas Morgan.
‘And she was looking to throw blame in every possible direction, despite it having been a positive piece.

‘She did not like the photographs. She thought the story was negative. She was upset that it was about Harry, not about her.’
‘And the clincher? It was racist. What upset her was the headline. She and Harry pointed out that the song, “I’m Just Wild About Harry”, had been performed by Judy Garland and Mickey Rooney as a blackface number in the 1939 film Babes In Arms.